🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump seemed to adopt a firm approach on the Ukrainian conflict. Following making statements of "significant repercussions" last August in case Vladimir Putin continued obstructing peace discussions, he finally imposed major penalties on the Russian two largest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This action substantially hindered the Russian leader's capability to support his aggression in Ukraine.

Yet, through his newly presented 28-point peace initiative for the conflict, which was developed by US and Russian officials lacking Ukraine's or EU input, the former president has clearly gone back to his Russia-friendly approach.

Favoring Military Action

Trump's plan would effectively reward Putin for occupying a sovereign nation while leaving the country's political freedom in jeopardy. Although strong statements that "The nation's autonomy will be confirmed", much of the initiative in reality undermine that very independence. What represents a Russian ideal would likely be a catastrophe for the nation.

Showing his corporate past, Trump persists to treat the Ukrainian conflict as a basic territorial dispute, like giving Putin a section of Ukraine's soil will please the ruler. Yet, Russia's war is not merely about dominating a destroyed swath of economically weakened territory in eastern Ukraine. It is about the nation's democracy – and Putin's obvious intention to destroy it so it no longer acts as an attractive standard for the Russian people of the democratic leadership that his increasing dictatorship denies them.

Territorial Giveaways

While freezing in status the currently separated Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, Trump's proposal would force the nation to abandon the entire Donetsk province. Beyond favoring Russia with land that its forces have been unable to capture in more than a ten years of warfare, this giveaway would render Ukrainian defensive positions severely compromised.

Donetsk is the place of the nation's well-known "defensive line", the entrenched military defenses that are a essential barrier to enemy progress. Trump would have the Ukrainian military abandon these defenses, giving Russian forces a clear route to Kyiv if he eventually opt to resume the hostilities.

Armed Forces Limitations

Additionally, in a move that would enable additional conflict simpler for Russia, the plan would force Ukraine to reduce the numbers of its military from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a maximum of six hundred thousand. Significantly, Trump's proposal places no similar limits on Russian forces.

Seemingly as a accommodation to Russia's efforts to characterize Ukraine's chosen by the people administration as radicals, Trump's plan states: "Every extremist ideology and practices must be opposed and forbidden." As if to emphasize this aspect, it requires that "The nation will hold political contests in this period" of a peace deal. Meanwhile, the proposal places no obligation that Putin jeopardize his authoritarian rule by allowing votes in Russia.

Defense Guarantees

To be sure, the initiative includes the Russian Federation promise not to "attack neighboring countries" and to "incorporate in regulation its policy of non-violence towards Europe and Ukraine". Yet given that the Russian leadership has breached comparable agreements in the past – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government pledged to recognize Ukraine's borders in exchange for surrendering its Soviet-era atomic arms, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Russia promised to a halt in fighting and a restoration of captured areas in eastern Ukraine to Kyiv – for what reason should we have confidence in Putin this time?

That is why Ukraine has been so insistent on external security guarantees. While the proposal threatens a "immediate joint military response" in case the Russian Federation resume its military campaign, and states that "The nation will receive strong protection assurances", the details vary from unclear to alarming. The proposal would not only prevent Ukraine Nato membership but also prevent member states from stationing troops on the nation's land, thus preventing the security presence, likely commanded by European powers, on which Ukraine had been depending to stop Russia from replenishing his diminished troops, re-equipping, and attacking again.

International Response

Another side agreement according to sources would grant Ukraine with a Nato-style protection assurance, in which any subsequent "serious, deliberate, and sustained aggression" by Russia on the country "will be treated as an assault jeopardizing the peace and security of the Western nations." This implies a armed reaction. However in contrast to a powerful Ukrainian military – the nation's most reliable protection against additional Russian aggression – the effectiveness of the parallel accord would hinge on the commitment of Western powers, including Trump, to react militarily to Putin's hostilities, something they have {not