🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is stored on this app, and now they expect us to fork out money for it."

One-star reviews and a sense of injustice have dominated digital forums since the app became the most recent technology company to put a price tag on a feature that individuals previously accessed for without payment.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in the fall that it would require payment from subscribers if they have over five GB of previously shared photos and clips stored as Snapchat Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these past uploads serve as a portal to bygone days – leading some to accuse the corporation of "profit-driven motives" in posts on digital networks and unfavorable ratings on digital storefronts.

Alternative Options

Snap has compared its subscription options to those made available by major companies for mobile devices.

And as an alternative for users unwilling to subscribe, users can download their Memories – which for some amount to tens of gigabytes – to their device.

The firm stated that only a minority of members would be affected by the new policy.

The company admitted that it was "always challenging to transition from accessing content at no charge to subscribing to it" – but implied it would be "worth the cost" for members.

Many opposing the change on the internet appear unconvinced.

Public Outcry

An online petition called the cost a "archival levy", with commenters labeling it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while an individual vowed never to use the app again.

Meanwhile, in a one-star review on the Google Play store, a user calling themselves Natacha Jonsson said it felt "morally questionable".

"If I know millennials right, many people have extensive archives of personal moments on the platform," they said. "And most of us only continued using Snapchat mostly for that feature. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have years worth of memories... Farewell Snapchat."

Additionally, a journalism student, a 20-year-old media studies major in a major city, posted on a social network her intention to remove the platform.

"I decided that I needed to download all my archived media as soon as I could," she mentioned. "Nearly every part of my adolescence have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to introduce fees users for a feature that has been at no cost for a considerable period."

Uncertain Costs

The platform has not disclosed how much subscription tiers would require in the UK – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet a young adult Amber Daley, who also lives in the city, commented in a video on the social platform that she would be "upset" by such charges.

Amber mentioned that the service had become "a regular habit" since she began accessing it in several years ago.

Although she acknowledged she recognized the service needed to make money, Amber proposed that the Memories feature is more valuable than the corporation may have anticipated.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust move to impose fees on your customers who have been consistent and engaged," she commented. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Professional Insight

Companies opting to impose fees from customers for a service that was once complimentary is a frequent occurrence, and numerous people subscribe to platforms like iCloud and Google Drive to backup their photos and videos from their mobile device.

The reality of storing data in the online servers – which various commentators in the technology sector like to refer to as simply "a remote system" – is that it involves expenses.

"Hosting trillions of saved content on the service demands considerable investment," online expert Matt Navarra stated. "The platform has to try to find a way to offset the expenses of storage, data transfer, copies, content delivery, security measures – all that stuff."

But the expert said that introducing fees for a service that had earlier required no payment, and subscribers had been encouraged to use as such, may seem like a "misleading tactic" for many people.

"Moving the goalposts after people have built this huge digital archive seems unfair," he noted. For numerous users, he stated, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're personal mementos."

The feeling was echoed by those leaving unfavorable comments, with one person labeling their archived media "deeply important to me".

"[Memories] have all elements of my experiences within them from celebrations of new family members' births, sad moments of loss, times spent with loved ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Research Perspective

Dr Taylor Annabell, a research fellow at a Dutch institution in the the Low Countries, explained that Snapchat's move shows the implications of business-oriented apps being used to store sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this trust, connected relationship, and presumption of never-ending access, which even encourages some users to remain with the platform or continue to use it in order to review their saved content," she explained to the BBC. "But these are not altruistic protectors of individual recollection."